Remember this date: January 6th, 2021. The real victor will be revealed.
”The victorious make many calculations prior to the fight, for every battle is won before it is ever fought.”
--Sun Tzu
So, why do I have this quote here? Well, believe it or not, the war is already over, it is just the losing side does not know it yet. Just remember this date: December 6th, 2020. To that end, I have two items to discuss. The first is a more in depth analysis of how the Constitution works. It is not my own work, but it does lay out how Trump has already won. The second outlines some of the Executive Power Trump still has at his disposal.
SCOTUS said no to Texas. They will not hear the case. Cue crazy leftists and their inane celebrations. You are probably pissed off by now because you thought the SCOTUS was going to take this case. Many can vouch for this, but I've stated a few times that the SCOTUS may throw this case out and that, if they did, Trump never needed them to begin with. This is an easy one to explain.
Justice Alito was right in his decision. He argued that the state of Texas was not, in so many words, as serious about a resolution as they pretended to be. He said there were not “interested” in a real resolution ...and he was right. He stated that just as in Arizona vs California 589 U.S. where they disputed over the distribution over the water from the Colorado river, the actions of one state cannot disenfranchise the actions of another. In other words, Texas cannot say they were wronged because they voted for Trump and Pennsylvania voted for Biden, even if the laws were illegal. One state cannot dictate the actions of another state otherwise we would have precedence for no individuality of states. They would all dispute over matters big and small until EVERY state had the same laws...therefore simulating a federal regulation where it becomes national. The SCOTUS cannot set that precedence. What would be next? California suing Nevada and Texas for having more favorable tax breaks, drawing California businesses to register there instead of California, disenfranchising the other taxpayers and programs in California that need the tax dollars (for example)?
Do you have any idea how bad it would be to make that precedence? When there is no competition there is tyranny.
The state of Texas produced a weak argument. Trump knew this but he still pushed it. Why? Legal strategy. Here is what I mean... In the legal world, the accuser (Plaintiff) has the greatest amount of pressure in the case. The accused (Defendant) is innocent by default so all of the pressure of proving their side rides on the accuser. At the same time, if the Judge throws the accuser's case out with prejudice, the accuser cannot bring that complaint up again. In a nutshell, the GREATEST risk to a case is to become the prosecutor. As a matter of fact, it is easier to DEFEND yourself than it is to PROSECUTE that the person you accused is guilty. Yes, a good defense is the best offense, but stay with me.
So whoever brings the case first runs the highest risk of losing before they even have a chance to fight. Why is that important? Because Trump stands a better chance of winning this as a defendant than he does as an plaintiff. Trump does not need the courts to win! He only needs for the state legislatures to do their jobs! And...if he gets a SCOTUS hearing that is just icing on the cake. Now let me tell you what is about to happen, and it is going to happen BIGLY.
Many thought that either SCOTUS would hear this first cast, that SCOTUS would NOT hear the first case but they may or may not hear the second case. Neither happened, so what?
Many, many, many state legislatures are pissed. Pissed as big as TEXAS pissed. They will feel as if THEY have been disenfranchised, and either on Monday December 14th or January 6th (when Congress counts the votes), the state legislatures will CHANGE their certifications to Trump, those 4 states (maybe even AZ and NV too). Then the fun starts. This will cause an internal legal battle within the states. By Article 2 Section 2 of the US Constitution, the state legislatures have the final say on whom they want to certify as the winner of their states. Well, this will piss off the Governors whom all have illegally certified the states and illegally passed state laws that strip the state legislatures of their Article 2 Section 2 powers.
The states (Governors, Secretary of States, Election idiots, Supreme Courts) will say “we have the right, we're not backing down” and the Governor's AG will say “see you in court.” Now comes phase 2. The SCOTUS is in a pickle. They do not have the authority to tell the state legislatures to ignore the US Constitution and follow federal law. Federal law is automatically overridden by the constitution. So they (SCOTUS) can do one of two things. Take the case and no matter what they ruled, the state legislatures can ignore it since SCOTUS has NO constitutional rights in dictating State Legislatures. Or the SCOTUS can do what I THINK they are going to do....throw the cases out. SCOTUS has backed themselves into a no win situation. Throwing OUT the cases, they legitimize the State legislature's decisions. Trump wins.
But what on the off chance if they take the case from the States who are screaming foul? Remember when it is harder to win as an plaintiff than it is as a defendant! Well the AG of PA (for example) will have to explain why and how any federal law can override the US Constitution. Point, Set, Match. I am betting that at least 5 of those Justices will disagree with that and they can LITERALLY cite the constitution as precedence and final authority. Trump wins. I believe that the SCOTUS will keep out of this for sake of not showing partiality and hide behind the Constitution, which is what they should do.
But if they DO get involved, it will be after January 6th where a constitutional crisis will exist and then they would need to step in and settle the matter in 3 possible ways:
1) Ignore the complaints, Trump wins...
2) Take the case(s), invalidate the elections, give it to the states to vote...Trump wins as we have a state majority of 27 or...
3) Take the case, order a nationwide audit and re-certification. With all the fraud.....Trump wins.
In the end, Trump will win. You can roll these dice as many times as you want. The Constitution will win this election for Trump.
On to the next topic: the real Executive Powers of the Presidency. Trump declares Marshall Law, declares a state of war against a foreign enemy (China), holds military tribunals, suspends habeas corpus, and starts throwing people in jail and begins ordering audits because he “feels” foreign influence has corrupted the election. Trump has thousands of affidavits, plenty to get the elected officials in those fraud States put behind bars for a long time. Not on trumped up charges, but on eye witness testimony under the penalty of perjury. Again, some states will rush to SCOTUS and remember, it is much harder to win as a plaintiff than as a defendant. Lincoln did it once, whipped out these powers, and Trump also has is 2018 Executive Order to seize all the Dominion Machines and do a full audit. So, when the whining States’ AGs petition the SCOTUS guess what? SCOTUS will tell them, Trump is doing NOTHING unconstitutional, and even if he is, what can we do? He is just demanding that States follow their own laws, and if they do not, well, there is a procedure on January 6th that decides, not us. SCOTUS will just defer, and then, Trump wins again. The ONLY thing I am wondering, is why he is taking so long to declare as state of war and start the military tribunals. He will probably but AG Barr on trial first. In the end, Trump wins, the Constitution wins, and America wins. In closing, Leo Tolstoy once said, “The strongest of all warriors are these two: time and patience.” Both of which are being tested now. I close with a quote from Grant…. “There are but two parties now: traitors and patriots. And I want hereafter to be ranked with the latter and, I trust, the stronger party.”
Pick one.
Comments