Skip to main content

Real Wealth Redistribution

I am writing this because I sent a somewhat cheeky email about a Father and Daughter (Dem v. Rep), and I got ONE irate response saying I was a propagandist! I was totally insulted, not because he thought I was a propagandist, but because if I was using propaganda, it would have been so much better than that email.

Anyway, it did get me thinking about the morass this country is in, and why we are so far apart concerning the budget, taxes, and pretty much everything. So, being an engineer and a bridge builder (yes I love it when everyone agrees with me!!!), I thought about a solution that I think both sides of the political spectrum could agree on.

If you really want to have a true redistribution of the wealth, then one thing needs to happen: wealthy, rich people need to go out and spend it on people trying to make a living locally, not charity..but prosperity…ooh, new slogan..…or invest it in companies…or whatever. Hording money is never a good thing, so how can we loosen those purse strings? One idea would be for a tax break for “investing” in every local company or establishment you “invested” in. Of course, there would be some exceptions, but say someone bought a dress, jewelry something from a variety of Austin companies (where they live)…and it totaled $100,000..then they could get a 10% reduction on their taxes, or $10,000 reduction in tax payments.

Some constraints would include that it would have to be over $100,000 invested in the next 6 months, will need to be with local merchants (car, boat and big ticket dealers included) and the deduction could be carried forwarded for 3 years. BOTH sides could NOT argue with a solution like this? A virtual tax “rebate” for the “wealthy” and a local stimulus package rolled up in one sweet package. The “job creators” would ACTUALLY be creating jobs and the social architects would see lower unemployment, more tax revenues from incomes and sales, and the “intangible paw of despair” will be lifted immediately.

So let’s do the math…say $100 Billion was pumped into the economy over the next 6 months. The impact would be like $250 billion was distributed, sales taxes would rise, income taxes would increase (more jobs, more money), etc. And the cost: $10 Billion in taxes not collected…but you would get $20 to $30 billion in new taxes. I know if I could double or triple my money, I would do that EVERYDAY!

Implementation would be super simple. The Executive Office could mandate an Order, the IRS could generate a “Form SP’ that would indicate that ‘x’ number of dollars were spent for such and such.

The effects would be felt immediately…as each dollar in the community usually gets “turned” about 2.5 times a month.

But here is the rub. Which Party will bite? This could be the differentiator in the coming election…because you cannot argue against it. This is TRUE social welfare where EVERYONE wins…my kind of solution. Let’s pray they are not all cowards in Congress.

Humbly,
Jeffrey Fry

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Moldy Middle

While taking statistics during my quest to get an MBA and while earning my engineering degree, the professors always emphasized the importance of finding the statistical mean of any population by using the Central Mean Theorem (a.k.a the highest point of the Bell Curve). As an engineer, this was essential in order to maximize throughput, minimize cost and waste, and ultimately make a better, faster, cheaper widget. A funny thing happened on the way to the dark side of marketing. I discovered that the only thing in the middle of the road was quite literally dead road kill. I do not know if you remember stores like Bradlees, Ames and Service Merchandise (just to name a few), but they all folded because the environment changed and they were caught trying to service the mythological “average customer.” Part of that change came when Wal-Mart began its juggernaut with the discount department store. Wal-Mart did two things right: 1) Focused on “mobile” consumers, and 2) Fo...

Fortune Cookie of Persistence

There are many things or factors that can determine a person’s success or failure, but one thing that cuts across EVERY successful person I have met or read about or studied is perseverance, persistence, stick-to-itiveness, and determination. As I say, "Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence. The desire and ability to press on has and always will solve the problems of the human race and divide those who achieve from those who might have been." Incredibly, this ONE characteristic is really what makes a true entrepreneur as testimony to these little factoids: Coca-Cola only sold twenty five (25) bottles in its first year of business! They grossed $50.0 and spent $73.96 on merchandising. But they kept on going and never gave up, and nowadays the sell more than one billion bottles per day! Apple Computer co-founder offered the computer design to Hewlett-Packard five times and was rejected by both HP and Atari (the giant at the time) for acquisition. A...

Chance and the Cosmos

What if we are alone?  With the recent breathtaking Venus in Transit pictures happening yesterday, I was amazed at the size and scope of this cosmic happening. What struck me was how everyone was talking about how rare an event this was, and it got me thinking about space, and probabilities, and are we alone? I remember as a kid hearing Carl Sagan talk about the billion upon billion of stars in the universe and the probability that somewhere out there, there has to be life around one of those other stars. According to the European Space Agency’s scientists, there are 1 times 10 to the 12 (a 1 with 12 zeros trailing) stars in our galaxy, and perhaps 1 times 10 to the 11 or 12 galaxies in the universe.  That means there are 1 times 10 to the 23 or 24 (1 with 24 zeros trailing) stars in our universe. That is a vast amount of places that could have a planet like ours.  But now we have to think small, like in chance and probabilities, and this got me postulating. Ea...