Real Wealth Redistribution

I am writing this because I sent a somewhat cheeky email about a Father and Daughter (Dem v. Rep), and I got ONE irate response saying I was a propagandist! I was totally insulted, not because he thought I was a propagandist, but because if I was using propaganda, it would have been so much better than that email.

Anyway, it did get me thinking about the morass this country is in, and why we are so far apart concerning the budget, taxes, and pretty much everything. So, being an engineer and a bridge builder (yes I love it when everyone agrees with me!!!), I thought about a solution that I think both sides of the political spectrum could agree on.

If you really want to have a true redistribution of the wealth, then one thing needs to happen: wealthy, rich people need to go out and spend it on people trying to make a living locally, not charity..but prosperity…ooh, new slogan..…or invest it in companies…or whatever. Hording money is never a good thing, so how can we loosen those purse strings? One idea would be for a tax break for “investing” in every local company or establishment you “invested” in. Of course, there would be some exceptions, but say someone bought a dress, jewelry something from a variety of Austin companies (where they live)…and it totaled $100,000..then they could get a 10% reduction on their taxes, or $10,000 reduction in tax payments.

Some constraints would include that it would have to be over $100,000 invested in the next 6 months, will need to be with local merchants (car, boat and big ticket dealers included) and the deduction could be carried forwarded for 3 years. BOTH sides could NOT argue with a solution like this? A virtual tax “rebate” for the “wealthy” and a local stimulus package rolled up in one sweet package. The “job creators” would ACTUALLY be creating jobs and the social architects would see lower unemployment, more tax revenues from incomes and sales, and the “intangible paw of despair” will be lifted immediately.

So let’s do the math…say $100 Billion was pumped into the economy over the next 6 months. The impact would be like $250 billion was distributed, sales taxes would rise, income taxes would increase (more jobs, more money), etc. And the cost: $10 Billion in taxes not collected…but you would get $20 to $30 billion in new taxes. I know if I could double or triple my money, I would do that EVERYDAY!

Implementation would be super simple. The Executive Office could mandate an Order, the IRS could generate a “Form SP’ that would indicate that ‘x’ number of dollars were spent for such and such.

The effects would be felt immediately…as each dollar in the community usually gets “turned” about 2.5 times a month.

But here is the rub. Which Party will bite? This could be the differentiator in the coming election…because you cannot argue against it. This is TRUE social welfare where EVERYONE wins…my kind of solution. Let’s pray they are not all cowards in Congress.

Humbly,

Jeffrey Fry

The Moldy Middle

While taking statistics during my quest to get an MBA and while earning my engineering degree, the professors always emphasized the importance of finding the statistical mean of any population by using the Central Mean Theorem (a.k.a the highest point of the Bell Curve). As an engineer, this was essential in order to maximize throughput, minimize cost and waste, and ultimately make a better, faster, cheaper widget. A funny thing happened on the way to the dark side of marketing. I discovered that the only thing in the middle of the road was quite literally dead road kill. I do not know if you remember stores like Bradlees, Ames and Service Merchandise (just to name a few), but they all folded because the environment changed and they were caught trying to service the mythological “average customer.” Part of that change came when Wal-Mart began its juggernaut with the discount department store. Wal-Mart did two things right: 1) Focused on “mobile” consumers, and 2) Fo...

The Saleman's Litmus Test

If your goal is to become a great company or even improve your existing one, every employee in you company should be able to “sell” the product or service that you are merchandising. Since that is usually not the case, you are forced to hire sales people to help implement the objectives laid out by upper management. A national study indicated that less than 3% of the population has an inherent penchant for sales, and as much as 50% of all salespeople really do not know how to sell. During my 20 odd years in sales, I have hired, worked with, and observed great sales people (yes, both men and women). Being the observant type and believing in best practices, I have complied a listing of questions you should ask any salesperson before you hire them, and should use this Litmus Test to review of your existing sales force to determine whether to keep them or cut them loose. I hope you find it useful. Psyching Out the Test : People always try to answer questions the way they thin...

Traits of an Entrepreneur

I will begin and end this article with two quotations. The first is from Edward Rogers: "You don't deserve to be called an entrepreneur unless you've mortgaged your house to the business." --Edward S. (Ted) Rogers This one sentence pretty much says it all. Entrepreneurs are not necessary gamblers, but they are willing to put everything they own, or go all in, in order to make it happen. In the classical sense an entrepreneur is define as anyone who has possession of a new enterprise, endeavor, venture or idea, and assumes significant accountability for the inherent risks associated with the development, growth, and outcome. He or she is an organizer who combines land, labor, material resources, and/or capital to create and market new goods, products, or services. The term "entrepreneur" is loaned from the French and was first defined by the Irish economist Richard Cantillon, where the term was applied to the type of persona who was willing to take upon th...

The Profit Prophet

Search This Blog